Political Baggage

The Rude Pundit is definitely right about HRC and her political baggage, fair or not, but this comment by Richard Florida characterizes some of my fears about Obama [via Roxanne]:

I have long said the central animating issue in American politics is neither partisan polarization nor the culture wars but a festering class divide. Obama may appeal to progressive members of the creative class who swung Iowa, but can that group (roughly a third of the workforce) swing the general election his way. Seems to me there is an even larger group of working and service class people who are frightened, scared, anxious, angry and resentful about what is happening to “their” America. Critics of my own work have already attempted to reduce the creative class to “yuppies, sophistos, trendoids, and gays.” My hunch is these same types will be all too eager to hang the label “elitist” all over Obama, framing him as a Harvard educated, Washington insider surrounded by a gaggle of Hollywood glitterati backers and the same old liberal establishment economic advisers (think Robert Rubin and Larry Summers).

If the Democrats (and the creative class) cannot figure a way out of this box - to articulate an inclusive agenda for the future which shows in plain and simple terms how working class and service class people can participate and prosper from the global creative economy, my assessment is that the electoral playing field will remain heavily tilted toward a reinvigorating Republican populism. Huckabee has the potential to tap into this zeitgeist in a way that could move far beyond the “Reagan democrats.” And Obama, despite his personal attractiveness and oratorical skills, runs the risk of being framed as another Gore or even Kerry.

For the record, I haven’t decided who I will vote for in my state’s primaries — I just haven’t been convinced either way — but what one might gather from my collected links on HRC is that I’m terribly bothered by the unfairness of the campaign coverage. It seems like we’re all too willing to position HRC as a calculating, cold-hearted opportunist (or overly emotional rag) in contrast to Obama as some kind of inspirational naif.

5 Responses to “Political Baggage”


  1. 1 arbitrista Feb 17th, 2008 at 12:17 am

    I think that your concern about Obama is certainly a reasonable one, but I really don’t see how Clinton wouldn’t be just as vulnerable to it. The public perception of her is that she is a standard mainstream D.C. liberal Democrat. I don’t see that as an insult, but many people would. The candidate in the race who made the most explicit argument about middle/working class anxiety was John Edwards, who was simply crucified by a hostile press. What happened to him makes me discouraged about any straightforward class-based politics.

  2. 2 Hugo Feb 17th, 2008 at 7:07 pm

    I wonder if Edwards’ pending endorsement of Obama (according to CNN) may assuage some of those working-class voter concerns.

    The GOP built a winning majority on a three-legged stool: social conservatives, economic conservatives, and foreign policy/defense conservatives. Mike Huckabee, who is the first but not the second, is exposing a serious weakness in that stool — as is McCain, who is definitely the third but who goes off the reservation at times on the first and second.

    The Dems need a platform that includes the anxious working class who care primarily about economic security — and the more comfortable suburbanites who are the typical “fiscal conservative, socially liberal, environmentally concerned” types who are easier for Obama to woo.

    Hey, Obama can talk about repaying student loans — who else can do that?

  3. 3 Redstar Feb 18th, 2008 at 3:18 pm

    Wasn’t Edwards leaning towards Clinton as recently as last week?

  4. 4 R. Mildred Feb 19th, 2008 at 7:11 pm

    Wasn’t Edwards leaning towards Clinton as recently as last week?
    I doubt the vice loser was. I really really do on a level I cannot convey through the constraints of the latin alphabet.
    I really don’t see how Clinton wouldn’t be just as vulnerable to it.
    You forget that Hillary’s policies involve A) having a slight catch in her voice which is totally the same as crying for some as yet unexplained reason and B) her vagina is actually a portal to a magical wonderland (that looks a bit like New Zealand) which is ruled by a talking lion who is also jesus.
    Cooter Narnia = immunity to criticism regarding her super privelaged class status. End of F**king discussion, she is a woman, she is by definition therefore perfect and any criticism is totally a form of sublimnal misogyny even if that makes no sense and is complete and ridiculously obvious bullshit.

    please ignore the policy vacuum behind the vagina owning douchebag, surely having her run for presidency won’t be a hideous vinegary train wreck or anything.

  5. 5 Red Seven Feb 20th, 2008 at 9:35 pm

    I’ve said from the beginning that it’s no accident that THIS black man and THIS woman are the FIRST black man and the FIRST woman to be taken seriously as a candidate for President of the United States. And the reason is this: neither of them conform to the stereotype of their group.

    The difference is that Barack Obama is being rewarded for not conforming to his stereotype while Hillary Rodham Clinton is being punished for not conforming to hers.

    I’m not a fan of the “Oppression Olympics,” where we try to figure out which oppressed group is more oppressed than all the others, but I do think that different “ism’s” play out in different ways. Racism is essentially a societal force that tries to get everyone to be more white — to speak the way white people speak, to dress the way white people dress, to behave the way that white people behave, and to punish those who don’t. Sexism is just the opposite, a societal force designed to keep men and women in rigidly defined gender roles, punishing men who speak, dress, and behave like women are “supposed” to, and women who speak, dress, and behave like men.

    The media’s reactions to Senators Clinton and Barack bear this out perfectly. Hillary has stepped away from a rigidly drawn definition of how a woman should behave, and it’s hurting her. Meanwhile, Barack began his campaign not with a loyal black following (they originally supported Sen. Clinton), but with a primarily white base. This bi-racial man who looks black but was raised by his white mother and white grandparents knows how to communicate with white people in a way that doesn’t push any of their racist buttons, and he does so brilliantly, and it’s giving him a big boost.

    For the record, I voted for Hillary (in the DC primary) but am perfectly happy supporting either candidate in the general election …

Leave a Reply